From the Ms. Magazine blog Twitter feed:
“Half of all pregnancies in the U.S. are unintended–how would making birth control less available solve this problem?”
There are some interesting points to this discussion and WNK would love to hear from our readers. Why should we pay for contraception for those who can’t afford it? Why should contraception be available and inexpensive? Would you rather pay for children that people can’t afford? Do you think people should be more responsible in making family planning choices?
“Contraception obviously is a deeply held value by American women. But the fact that in the United States a startling half of all pregnancies are unintended makes clear that birth control is used only sporadically by some. There are a number of reasons why this is so, but a chief one is that so many women cannot afford contraception, especially the most expensive—and most effective–methods, such as birth control pills, and long lasting reversible contraception, for example, the newer (and far safer) models of IUDs (intrauterine devices). In short, the same economic disparities that pervade every other area of American life manifest here as well: poor women depend on publicly-funded programs for their contraceptive services, but, according to the Guttmacher Institute, only a little more than half of the 17 million women who need these services currently receive them.”
Check out the rest of the article here.
- Restrictions on birth control hurt everyone (thehill.com)
- Editorial: Battling Over Birth Control (nytimes.com)
- Viagra 1 Birth Control 0 (whynokids.com)
- Many Women Use The Pill For So Much More Than Pregnancy Prevention (blisstree.com)